Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?

Santi Pratiwi Tri Utami; Andayani; Retno Winarni; Sumarwati

doi:10.30935/cedtech/13419

Santi Pratiwi Tri Utami ¹ ² ^* , Andayani ¹, Retno Winarni ¹, Sumarwati ¹

More Detail

CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, Volume 15, Issue 4, Article No: ep450

https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419

Submitted: 15 March 2023, Published Online: 19 June 2023

OPEN ACCESS 8155 Views 11057 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Research shows that artificial intelligence (AI) technology positively influences students’ writing skills, but this area has yet to be touched by Indonesian researchers. This study aims to map perception, obstacles, and recommendations for optimizing use of AI in teaching academic writing in Indonesian. This article focuses on a case study of three senior high schools in Central Java, Indonesia. It employs quantitative and qualitative data. The researcher collected the data using questionnaires presented with Likert scale, followed by an in-depth interview through mobile instant messaging interview. Findings show that (1) AI-based learning tools help students to do academic research, especially in the planning step, to identify and develop the topics, as well as in the drafting step, to develop a paper draft, (2) AI-based learning tools are deemed flexible in accessibility despite not being able to cover all necessities required by students in writing process, (3) students are interested in using AI technology in academic writing class so that learning process will not be boring. Although AI has been used in academic writing classes, tools have not positively impacted quality of students’ academic papers in all indicators. There are several obstacles to using AI, namely (1) need for more available feature, especially in editing Indonesian text, and (2) in contrast, the features still need to be optimized. These are the recommendations for the optimization of AI-based learning tools, which are (1) adding features to edit Indonesian text, including spelling, diction, and sentence structure, and (2) enhancing AI literacy to be able to explore and leverage the existing features optimally. This research has yet to accommodate the possible coverage in checking the originality and accuracy of the written product assisted by AI-based learning tools, which could become a focus for future researchers.

Keywords: perception, AI technology, learning tools, academic writing

References

Abdalkader, S. (2022). Using artificial intelligence to improve writing fluency for the preparatory stage students in distinguished governmental language schools. Egyptian Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 39-70. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejes.2022.270694
ACARA. (2021). National assessment program: Literacy and numeracy. Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority. https://reports.acara.edu.au/NAP
Agencia de Calidad de la Educación [Education Quality Agency]. (2017). Informe de resultados de aprendizaje escritura 2016 sexto básico [2016 learning outcomes report writing sixth grade]. Ministerio de Educación [Ministry of Education]. http://archivos.agenciaeducacion.cl/resultados_nacionales_escritura_2016.pdf
Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the foreign language classroom: A pedagogical overview of automated writing assistance tools. Education Research International, 2023, 4253331. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331
Altmäe, S., Sola-Leyva, A., & Salumets, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: A friend or a foe? Reproductive BioMedicine Online. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.04.009
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.
Bañales, G., Ahumada, S., Graham, S., Puente, A., Guajardo, M., & Muñoz, I. (2020). Teaching writing in grades 4-6 in urban schools in Chile: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 33, 2661-2696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10055-z
Burkhard, M. (2022). Student perceptions of AI-powered writing tools: Towards individualized teaching strategies. In Proceedings of the 19^th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age.
Camacho, A., & Alves, R. A. (2017). Fostering parental involvement in writing: Development and testing of the program cultivating writing. Reading and Writing, 30(2), 253-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9672-6
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 907-919. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012656
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
De Smedt, F., van Keer, H., & Merchie, E. (2016). Student, teacher, and class-level correlates of Flemish late elementary school children’s writing performance. Reading & Writing, 29, 833-868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9590-z
Elmunsyah, H., Suswanto, H., Asfani, K., & Hidayat, W. (2018). The effectiveness of plagiarism checker implementation in scientific writing for vocational high school. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Indonesian Technical Vocational Education and Association (pp. 192-196). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aptekindo-18.2018.42
Fang, Z. (2021). Demystifying academic writing: Genres, moves, skills, and strategies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003131618
Feliks, T., Semiun, A., & Nalley, H. (2019). The teaching and learning of writing in Indonesian: A case study of a primary school. Academic Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 19-29.
Fitria, T. (2021). Grammarly as AI-powered English writing assistant: Students’ alternative for writing English. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i1.3519
Gayed, J. M, Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing assistant’s impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055
Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 5-24. http://doi.org/10125/73474
Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43, 277-303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x18821125
Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & McKeown, D. (2013). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and Writing, 26, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2
Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), ep421. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036
Inayah, N., & Nanda, R. P. (2016). Efforts to improve writing skills of high school students. Studies in English Language and Education, 3(1), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v3i1.3388
Indriyani, D., & Solihati, K. D. (2021). An overview of Indonesian’s challenging future: Management of artificial intelligence in education. In Proceedings of the 2^nd International Conference on Administration Science 2020 (pp. 279-284). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210629.053
Kangasharju, A., Ilomäki L., Lakkala, M., & Toom, A. (2022). Lower secondary students’ poetry writing with the AI-based poetry machine. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100048
Kaufmann, K., & Peil, C. (2020). The mobile instant messaging interview (MIMI): Using WhatsApp to enhance self-reporting and explore media usage in situ. Mobile Media and Communication, 8(2), 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157919852392
Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
Kurniasih, Sholihah, F. A., Umamah, A., & Hidayanti, I. (2020). Writing process approach and its effect on students writing anxiety and performance. Jurnal Arbitrer [Arbitrator Journal], 7(2), 144-150. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.7.2.144-150.2020
Labonté, C., & Smith, V. R. (2022). Learning through technology in middle school classrooms: Students’ perceptions of their self-directed and collaborative learning with and without technology. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6317-6332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10885-6
Madison, E., Anderson, R. C., & Bousselot, T. (2019). Self-determined to write: Catalyzing critical thinking, collaboration, and self-direction in middle school. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 35(5), 473-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1579127
Maeng, W., Ahn, H., Yoon J., & Lee J. (2016). Can mobile instant messaging be a useful interviewing tool? A comparative analysis of phone use, instant messaging, and mobile instant messaging. In Proceedings of HCI Korea ‘16 (pp. 45-49). https://doi.org/10.17210/hcik.2016.01.45.
Mediyawati, N., Young, J. C., & Nusantara, S. B. (2021). U-tapis: Automatic spelling filter as an effort to improve Indonesian language competencies of journalistic students. Cakrawala Pendidikan [Educational Horizon], 40(2), 402-412. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i2.34546
Miller, L., & Wu, J. G. (2021). Language learning with technology: Perspectives from Asia. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2697-5
Molenaar, I. (2022). The concept of hybrid human-AI regulation: Exemplifying how to support young learners’ self-regulated learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100070
Muñoz, A., & Ramirez, M. (2015). Teachers’ conceptions of motivation and motivating practices in second-language learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 13(2), 198-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878515593885
Mursyid. (2023). Integrating AI-based writing tools to enhance students’ learning process in digital writing. In Proceedings International Conference on Education of Suryakancana 2023 (pp. 564-569). https://doi.org/10.35194/cp.v0i0.3040
Myers, J., Scales, R., Grisham, D., Wolsey, T., Dismuke, S., Smetana, L., & Yoder, K. K. (2016). What about writing? A national study of writing instruction in teacher preparation programs. Literacy, Research, and Instruction, 55(4), 309-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2016.1198442
Nakazawa, E., Udagawa, M., & Akabayashi, A. (2022). Does the use of AI to create academic research papers undermine researcher originality? AI, 3(3), 702-706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai3030040
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012-470). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2011/2012470.pdf
Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
Ng, D. T. K., Luo, W., Chan, H. M. Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using digital story writing as a pedagogy to develop AI literacy among primary students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100054
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan [Regulations of the Minister of Education and Culture]. (2018). Perubahan atas peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 24 Tahun 2016 tentang kompetensi inti dan kompetensi dasar pelajaran pada kurikulum 2013 pada pendidikan dasar dan pendidikan menengah [Amendments to The Ministry of Education and Culture Regulation Number 24 of 2016 regarding core competencies and basic competency lessons in the 2013 curriculum in elementary education and secondary education]. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia [Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia].
Peter, J., & Singaravelu. (2020). Problems in writing in English among high school learners. Aegaeum Journal, 8(9), 1502-1515.
Pitrianti, S., & Gasanti, R. (2020). Analisis kesulitan menulis karya ilmiah siswa SMA terbuka [Analysis of the difficulty of writing scientific work for Terbuka Senior High School]. Jurnal Literasi [Literacy Journal], 4(2), 92-99. https://doi.org/10.25157/literasi.v4i2.4283
Razack, H. I. A., Mathew, S. T., Saad, F. F. A., & Alqahtani, S. A. (2021). Artificial intelligence-assisted tools for redefining the communication landscape of the scholarly world. Science Editing, 8(2), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.244
Scherer, R., Nilsen, T., & Jansen, M. (2016). Evaluating individual students’ perceptions of instructional quality: An investigation of their factor structure, measurement invariance, and relations to educational outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00110
Sudiati, & Nurhidayah. (2008). Peningkatan menulis karya ilmiah siswa kelas II SMA UII Yogyakarta [Improvement in writing scientific papers for second grade students SMA UII Yogyakarta]. Litera, 7(2), 174-186.
Sumakul, D. T. Y. G., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022a). Artificial intelligence in EFL classrooms: Friend or foe? LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 232-256.
Sumakul, D. T. Y. G., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022b). Students’ perceptions of the use of AI in a writing class. In Proceedings of the 67^th TEFLIN International Virtual Conference & the 9^th ICOELT 2021 (pp. 52-57). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220201.009
Sureda-Negre, J., Comas-Forgas, R., & Oliver-Trobat, M. (2015). Plagio académico entre alumnado de Secundaria y Bachillerato: Diferencias en cuanto al género y la procrastinación [Academic plagiarism among secondary and High School students: Differences in gender and procrastination]. Comunicar [Communicate], 44, 103-111. https://doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-11
Sutama, I. M., & Utama, I. D. G. B. (2017). Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi (TIK) dalam pembelajaran menulis di sekolah menengah atas [Utilization of information and communication technology (ICT) in learning to write in high school]. In Proceedings of the National Seminar on Innovative Research (pp. 522-529).
Teo, T. (2019). Students and teachers’ intention to use technology: Assessing their measurement equivalence and structural invariance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(1), 201-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117749430
Thomas, D. P. (2020). Rapid decline and gender disparities in the NAPLAN writing data. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47(5), 777-796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00366-8
Tompkins, G. E., & Hoskisson, K. (1995). Language arts content and teaching strategies. Pentice Hall.
UNESCO IITE. (2020). AI in education: Change at the speed of learning. https://iite.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Steven_Duggan_AI-in-Education_2020.pdf
UNESCO. (2017). Fostering a culture of reading and writing: Examples of dynamic literate environments: Selected case studies. Institute for Lifelong learning. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000257933
Veiga-Simao, A. M., Malpique, A. A., Frison, L. M. B., & Marques, A. (2016). Teaching writing to middle school students in Portugal and in Brazil: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing, 29(5), 955-979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9606-8
Widyana, A., Jerusalem, M. I., & Yumechas, B. (2022). The application of text-to-speech technology in language learning. In Proceedings of the 6^th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (pp. 85-92). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-91-6_14

Citation

Utami, S. P. T., Andayani, Winarni, R., & Sumarwati (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep450. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419

Utami, S. P. T., Andayani, Winarni, R., and Sumarwati (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep450. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419

Utami SPT, Andayani, Winarni R, Sumarwati. Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2023;15(4), ep450. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419

Utami, Santi Pratiwi Tri, Andayani, Retno Winarni, and Sumarwati. "Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?". Contemporary Educational Technology 2023 15 no. 4 (2023): ep450. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419

Utami, Santi Pratiwi Tri et al. "Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?". Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 15, no. 4, 2023, ep450. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419

Utami SPT, Andayani, Winarni R, Sumarwati. Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2023;15(4):ep450. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419