The Importance of Digital Literacy in Quadratic Equations, Strategies Used, and Issues Faced by Educators

Richeal Phil Thien Kim How; Hutkemri Zulnaidi; Suzieleez Syrene Abdul Rahim

doi:10.30935/cedtech/12023

Richeal Phil Thien Kim How ¹, Hutkemri Zulnaidi ¹ ^* , Suzieleez Syrene Abdul Rahim ¹

More Detail

CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, Volume 14, Issue 3, Article No: ep372

https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12023

Submitted: 04 January 2022, Published Online: 15 April 2022

OPEN ACCESS 1971 Views 1702 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the teaching styles and problems that are faced by teachers in cultivating digital literacy skills for the topic of quadratic equations. This study helps to overcome and refine all shortcomings that occur in the process of instilling digital literacy skills into the topic of quadratic equations. This study employed a qualitative approach by adopting the structured interview method that involved four participants from three districts in Malaysia. The interview data were analyzed using the ATLAS.ti 8 software by dividing the transcripts into small codes based on thematic analysis. The findings show that the importance of digital literacy skills in quadratic equation comprises the aspect of motivation, space saving, conducive environment, fostering thinking skills, and diversity of resources. The results have also indicated that the teachers’ teaching approach is based on existing hardware and software such as the Microsoft software, Google software, teaching aids, the Internet resources, and mobile device applications. Among the constraints that are faced by the teachers include the use of technology in calculations, communicating information, issues in exploring the diversity of information, issues in mathematical modelling, and technical limitations. Accordingly, all emerging themes and codes are summarized using schematic diagrams. A major implication of this research is that it serves as a catalyst in cultivating digital literacy among generation Z such as using the TI-Nspire software to solve mathematical problems.

Keywords: quadratic equation, qualitative approach, teaching styles, problems, digital literacy skills

References

Abramovich, S. (2016). Exploring quadratic equations with digital tools in mathematics teacher education. Teaching of Mathematics, 19(2), 84-100.
Akugizibwe, E., & Ahn, J. Y. (2020). Perspectives for effective integration of e-learning tools in university mathematics instruction for developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 889-903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09995-z
Alkhateeb, M. A., & Al-Duwairi, A. M. (2019). The effect of using mobile applications (GeoGebra and Sketchpad) on the students’ achievement. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 523-533. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5754
Amran, M. S., Abu Bakar, K., Surat, S., Mahmud, S. N. D., & Mohd Shafie, A. A. (2021). Assessing preschool teachers’ challenges and needs for creativity in STEM education. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(3), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i3.14517
Aziz, T. A., Pramudiani, P., & Purnomo, Y. W. (2018). Differences between quadratic equations and functions: Indonesian pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ views. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012043
Baring, C. C., & Alegre, E. M. (2019). Difficulties encountered in solving quadratic equation of the grade 9 students: Basis for constructing instructional materials. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 9(5), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.9.05.2019.p8931
Barraza Castillo, R. I., Cruz Sánchez, V. G., & Vergara Villegas, O. O. (2015). A pilot study on the use of mobile augmented reality for interactive experimentation in quadratic equations. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, 946034. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/946034
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Pearson A & B.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative. Pearson.
Didis, M. G., & Erbas, A. K. (2015). Performance and difficulties of students in formulating and solving quadratic equations with one unknown. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(4), 1137-1150. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.4.2743
Gay, A. S., Barry, A. L., Rothrock, K. S., & Pelkey, M. M. (2020). Mathematics student teachers’ views and choices about teaching and textbooks in middle and high school classrooms. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.642
Guner, P., & Uygun, T. (2016). Developmental process of quadratic equations from past to present and reflections on teaching-learning. Hasan Ali Yücel Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hasan Ali Yucel Journal of the Faculty of Education], 13(3), 149-163.
Hallová, M., Polakovič, P., & Slováková, I. (2017). Current trends in training of managers in the field of information and communication technologies and identifying the barriers to education of managers. AGRIS on-Line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 9(4), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.276065
Hu, Q., Son, J. W., & Hodge, L. (2021). Algebra teachers’ interpretation and responses to student errors in solving quadratic equations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(3), 637-657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10166-1
Iberahim, A. R., Mahamod, Z., & Mohammad, W. M. R. W. (2017). Pembelajaran abad ke-21 dan pengaruhnya terhadap sikap, motivasi dan pencapaian bahasa melayu pelajar sekolah menengah [21st century learning and its influence on the attitudes, motivation and achievement of the Malay language of secondary school students]. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu [Journal of Malay Language Education], 7(2), 77-88.
Kabar, M. G. D. (2018). Secondary school students’ conception of quadratic equations with one unknown. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 19(1), 112-129.
Katz, V., & Barton, B. (2007). Stages in the history of algebra with implications for teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9023-7
Kim How, R. P. T., Zulnaidi, H., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2022). HOTS in quadratic equations: Teaching style preferences and challenges faced by Malaysian teachers. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11382
Kirchherr, J., & Charles, K. (2018). Enhancing the sample diversity of snowball samples: Recommendations from a research project on anti-dam movements in Southeast Asia. PloS ONE, 13(8), e0201710. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201710
Klemer, A., & Rapoport, S. (2020). Origami and GeoGebra activities contribute to geometric thinking in second graders. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(11), em1894. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8537
LaCour, M., Cantú, N. G., & Davis, T. (2019). When calculators lie: A demonstration of uncritical calculator usage among college students and factors that improve performance. PLoS ONE, 14(10), e0223736. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223736
Lima, R. N. D. & Tall, D. (2006). The concept of equations: What have students met before? In Proceedings 30^th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 233-240). PME.
Majeed, B. H., Jawad, L. F., & AlRikabi, H. (2021). Tactical thinking and its relationship with solving mathematical problems among mathematics department students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(9), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i09.22203
Majid, M. A. A., Othman, M., Mohamad, S. F., Lim, S. A. H., & Yusof, A. (2017). Piloting for interviews in qualitative research: Operationalization and lessons learnt. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(4), 1073-1080. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i4/2916
Malaysia Examination Board. (2022). Kupasan mutu jawapan (KMJ) matematik tambahan kertas 1 SPM 2020 [Answer quality survey (KMJ) mathematics supplementary paper 1 SPM 2020]. Ministry of Education Malaysia. https://www.bumigemilang.com/kupasan-mutu-jawapan-soalan-spm/
Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the ‘digital society’. In C. Lankshear, & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies & practices (pp. 151-176). Peter Lang.
Mat, N., & Maat, S. M. (2020). Faktor dan implikasi daya tahan dalam pembelajaran matematik: Sorotan literatur bersistematik [Factors and implications of resilience in mathematics learning: A systematic literature review]. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(12), 90-105. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i12.576
Melnick, S. A., & Meister, D. G. (2008). A comparison of beginning and experienced teachers’ concerns. Educational Research Quarterly, 31(3), 39-56.http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ788428.pdf
Mohamed, H., Judi, H. M., Noor, S. F. M., & Yusof, Z. M. (2012). Jurang digital dan pendidikan di luar bandar: Tahap literasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi pelajar [Digital divide and rural education: Levels of information and communication technology literacy of students]. Jurnal Teknologi Maklumat dan Multimedia Asia-Pasifik [Asia-Pacific Journal of Information Technology and Multimedia], 1(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.17576/apjitm-2012-0102-01
Morales Carballo, A., Damián Mojica, A., & Marmolejo Vega, J. E. (2022). Hypothetical learning trajectory for assimilating the articulated concepts of quadratic function and equation through variational ideas and the use of GeoGebra in pre-university students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), em0678. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11714
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results in focus: What fifteen-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-assessment-and-analytical-framework_b25efab8-en
Peng, L. Y., Luan, W. S., Ayub, A. F. M., & Ling, W. S. (2020). Hubungan di antara strategi pembelajaran dengan literasi teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi pelajar prasiswazah [The relationship between learning strategies and information technology literacy and communication of undergraduate students]. Malaysian Journal of Education, 45(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.17576/JPEN-2020-45.01-01
Pierce, R., & Ball, L. (2009). Perceptions that may affect teachers’ intention to use technology in secondary mathematics classes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9177-6
Pradana, L., Sholikhah, O., Maharani, S., & Kholid, M. (2020). Virtual mathematics kits (VMK): Connecting digital media to mathematical literacy. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(3), 234-241. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i03.11674
Rashidi, M. N., Begum, R. A., Mokhtar, M., & Pereira, J. J. (2014). The conduct of structured interviews as research implementation method. Journal of Advanced Research Design, 1(1), 28-34.
Rizal, R., Setiawan, W., & Rusdiana, D. (2019, February). Digital literacy of preservice science teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2), 022058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022058
Robabi, H., & Arbabisarjou, A. (2015). Computer literacy among students of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. Global Journal of Health Science, 7(4), 136-142. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n4p136
Salleh, N.S., Din, R., Hamdan, A., Kamsin, I. F., Abdul Manaf, S. Z., Karim, A. A., & Ahmad, M. (2015). Pembudayaan literasi ICT dalam kalangan pelajar orang asli menerusi persekitaran pembelajaran peribadi [Cultivation of ICT literacy among indigenous students through personal learning environment]. Journal of Personalized Learning, 1(1), 46-56.
Santagata, R., König, J., Scheiner, T., Nguyen, H., Adleff, A. K., Yang, X., & Kaiser, G. (2021). Mathematics teacher learning to notice: A systematic review of studies of video-based programs. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01216-z
Sari, I. F. D. P., & Jailani, J. (2019). Error analysis for grade IX students in completing the materials of quadratic equation. Annals of Mathematical Modeling, 1(2), 64-80.
Sari, W. N., Samosir, B. S., Sahara, N., Agustina, L., & Anita, Y. (2020). Learning mathematics “Asyik” with Youtube educative media. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1477(2), 022012. https://10.1088/17426596/1477/2/022012
Setyaningsih, R., Abdullah, A., Prihantoro, E., & Hustinawaty, H. (2019). Model penguatan literasi digital melalui pemanfaatan e-learning [A model for strengthening digital literacy through the use of e-learning]. Jurnal ASPIKOM [Journal ASPICOM], 3(6), 1200-1214. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v3i6.333
Shariman, T. P. N. T., Razak, N. A., & Noor, N. F. M. (2012). Digital literacy competence for academic needs: An analysis of Malaysian students in three universities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1489-1496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.090
Sosa-Moguel, L., & Aparicio-Landa, E. (2021). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ perceptions about inductive reasoning and their interpretation in teaching. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 239-256. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.2.12863.239-256
Stewart, S., Andrews-Larson, C., & Zandieh, M. (2019). Linear algebra teaching and learning: Themes from recent research and evolving research priorities. ZDM, 51(7), 1017-1030. https://10.1007/s11858-019-01104-1
Talib, O. (2019). Analisis data kualitatif dengan ATLAS.ti 8 [Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti 8]. UPM Publication.
Teh, A. H. (2015). Kaedah pemfaktoran ajaib ungkapan kuadratik (P.A.U.K) [Magic factorization method of quadratic expressions (M.F.Q.E)]. Jurnal Pendidikan Kent [Kent Journal of Education], 14, 122-131.
Teoh, S. H., Singh, P., & Halim, U. K. A. (2018). Understanding of function and quadratic function among secondary school students in Selangor. Asian Journal of University Education, 14(1), 77-88.
Thomas, D. S., & Mahmud, M. S. (2021). Analysis of students’ error in solving quadratic equations using Newman’s procedure. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(12), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i12/11760
Tran, T., Phan, H., Le, H., & Nguyen, H. (2020). ICT integration in developing competence for pre-service mathematics teachers: A case study from six universities in Vietnam. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(14), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i14.14015
Utami, N. S., & Jupri, A. (2021). Students’ structure sense ability in solving quadratic equation problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 12061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012061
Vaiyavutjamai, P., & Clements, M. K. (2006). Effects of classroom instruction on students’ understanding of quadratic equations. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(1), 47-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217429
Vaiyavutjamai, P., Ellerton, N. F., & Clements, M. A. (2005). Students’ attempts to solve two elementary quadratic equations: A study in three nations. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, & D. Gronn (Eds.), Building connections: Theory, research and practice (pp. 735-742). MERGA.
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J., van Dijk, J. A., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
Watt, H. M. G. (2005). Exploring adolescent motivations for pursuing maths-related careers. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 5, 107-116. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ815605.pdf
Yanuarto, W. N., Maat, S. M., & Husnin, H. (2021, February). Teacher’s belief and mathematical knowledge contributing ICT literacy in an Indonesian context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1778(1), 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1778/1/012037
Yeow, P. C., Thavamani, R., Kamalah, R., Wong, J. W., & Santhanasamy V. D. (2019). Buku teks matematik tingkatan empat [Fourth grade math textbook]. Pustaka Yakin Press.
Zan, B., Colaklar, H., Altay, A., & Taskin, N. (2021). A study on digital literacy skills of faculty of letters students: Use of university library. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(1), 152-171. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i01.16567
Zulnaidi, H. (2013). Pembangunan dan keberkesanan modul pengajaran GeoGebra ke atas pengetahuan konseptual dan prosedural matematik fungsi dan had fungsi [Development and effectiveness of GeoGebra teaching modules on conceptual and procedural knowledge of functional mathematics and functional limits] [Unpublished PhD’s thesis]. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.

Citation

Kim How, R. P. T., Zulnaidi, H., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2022). The Importance of Digital Literacy in Quadratic Equations, Strategies Used, and Issues Faced by Educators. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(3), ep372. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12023

Kim How, R. P. T., Zulnaidi, H., and Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2022). The Importance of Digital Literacy in Quadratic Equations, Strategies Used, and Issues Faced by Educators. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(3), ep372. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12023

Kim How RPT, Zulnaidi H, Abdul Rahim SS. The Importance of Digital Literacy in Quadratic Equations, Strategies Used, and Issues Faced by Educators. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2022;14(3), ep372. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12023

Kim How, Richeal Phil Thien, Hutkemri Zulnaidi, and Suzieleez Syrene Abdul Rahim. "The Importance of Digital Literacy in Quadratic Equations, Strategies Used, and Issues Faced by Educators". Contemporary Educational Technology 2022 14 no. 3 (2022): ep372. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12023

Kim How, Richeal Phil Thien et al. "The Importance of Digital Literacy in Quadratic Equations, Strategies Used, and Issues Faced by Educators". Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 14, no. 3, 2022, ep372. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12023

Kim How RPT, Zulnaidi H, Abdul Rahim SS. The Importance of Digital Literacy in Quadratic Equations, Strategies Used, and Issues Faced by Educators. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2022;14(3):ep372. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12023