Enhancing mathematics education for students with special educational needs through generative AI: A case study in Greece

Ioannis Rizos; Evaggelos Foykas; Spiros V. Georgakopoulos

doi:10.30935/cedtech/15487

Ioannis Rizos ¹ ^* , Evaggelos Foykas ², Spiros V. Georgakopoulos ¹

More Detail

CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, Volume 16, Issue 4, Article No: ep535

https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15487

Submitted: 05 July 2024, Published Online: 17 October 2024

OPEN ACCESS 893 Views 453 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to have a profound impact on various aspects of human society, including mathematics education. Nevertheless, there is a noticeable lack of research, particularly in Greece, that focuses on the development and assessment of lesson plans and math worksheets tailored for students with special educational needs. To address this research gap, we designed and conducted a nine-hour teaching intervention in a general mathematics classroom in Greece, involving two 8^th grade students with special educational needs as the subjects of the study. The intervention utilized worksheets generated by the ChatGPT 3.5 application, which were customized based on the current curriculum, as well as the special educational needs and interests of the two participating students. The data were collected through interviews, tasks, and e-questionnaires, and analyzed using a new theoretical framework based on the concept of mathematical familiarity. The results indicated that students were actively engaged in the educational process, felt safe and confident, satisfactorily met the learning objectives, and developed positive attitudes towards the mathematics course. The paper concludes with a list of good practices, teaching suggestions and restrictions that could be useful to teachers and education policy makers. The target audience for the current study is, mainly, mathematics teachers who serve at all levels of education and have students with special educational needs in their classrooms. Furthermore, the article may also prove of interest to students, parents and teachers who are interested in the interaction between mathematics education and generative AI.

Keywords: special educational needs, mathematical familiarity, math worksheets, ChatGPT, qualitative research

References

Abreu, R. L., Townsend, D., Mitchell, Y., Ward, J., Audette, L., & Gonzalez, K. A. (2022). LGBTQ qualitative and mixed methods research in counseling psychology: A content analysis. The Counseling Psychologist, 50(5), 708–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000221092481
Alsolami, A. S. (2022). Teachers of special education and assistive technology: Teachers’ perceptions of knowledge, competencies and professional development. Sage Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079900
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5™ (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Anteneh, B. A., & Anshu, A. H. (2024). ELT teachers’ curriculum implementation approaches in teaching freshman English at Ethiopian public universities’ context. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2348862. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2348862
Astle, D. E., & Fletcher-Watson, S. (2020). Beyond the core-deficit hypothesis in developmental disorders. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(5), 431–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420925518
Awofala, A. O. A., & Lawani, A. O. (2020). Increasing mathematics achievement of senior secondary school students through differentiated instruction. Description of our teaching intervention. Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.4.1.p.1-19
Bartholomew, T. T., & Lockard, A. J. (2018). Mixed methods in psychotherapy research: A review of method(ology) integration in psychotherapy science. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(10), 1687–1709. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22653
Bounou, A., Lavidas, K., Komis, V., Papadakis, S., & Manoli, P. (2023). Correlation between high school students’ computational thinking and their performance in STEM and language courses. Education Sciences, 13(11), Article 1101. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111101
Castro, R. A. G., Cachicatari, N. A. M., Aste, W. M. B., & Medina, M. P. L. (2024). Exploration of ChatGPT in basic education: Advantages, disadvantages, and its impact on school tasks. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(3), Article ep511. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14615
Denzin, N. K. (2009). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Transaction Publishers.
Dindler, C., Smith, R., & Iversen, O. S. (2020). Computational empowerment: Participatory design in education. CoDesign, 16(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1722173
Ding, L., Kim, S., & Allday, R. A. (2024). Development of an AI literacy assessment for non-technical individuals: What do teachers know? Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(3), Article ep512. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14619
Drolia, M., Papadakis, S., Sifaki, E., & Kalogiannakis M. (2022). Mobile learning applications for refugees: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 12(2), Article 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020096
Duff, D. M., Hendricks, A. E., Fitton, L., & Adlof, S. M. (2023). Reading and math achievement in children with dyslexia, developmental language disorder, or typical development: Achievement gaps persist from second through fourth grades. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 56(5), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194221105515
Feigenbaum, K. D. (2024). A critique of Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers as educators. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 64(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678231154819
Florian, L., & Beaton, M. (2018). Inclusive pedagogy in action: Getting it right for every child. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(8), 870–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1412513
Foykas, E. (2024a). Children’s voice as a parameter of Ryan’s model for promoting inclusive education: The case of Greece. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.3.824
Foykas, E. (2024b). How can the inclusive school leader promote a democratic society? The case of Greek schools. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(3), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.3.842
Gheyssens, E., Coubergs, C., Griful-Freixenet, J., Engels, N., & Struyven, K. (2022). Differentiated instruction: The diversity of teachers’ philosophy and praxis to adapt teaching to students’ interests, readiness and learning profiles. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(14), 1383–1400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1812739
Ginja, T. G., & Chen, X. (2023). Conceptualising inclusive education: The role of teacher training and teacher’s attitudes towards inclusion of children with disabilities in Ethiopia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(9), 1042–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1879958
Grabiner, J. (1995). Descartes and problem-solving. Mathematics Magazine, 68(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/2691183
Griffiths, M. A., Goodyear, V. A., & Armour, K. M. (2022). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) for professional development: Meeting the needs and expectations of physical education teachers and youth sport coaches. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 27(3), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1874901
Hackenberg, A. J., Creager, M., & Eker, A. (2021). Teaching practices for differentiating mathematics instruction for middle school students. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(2), 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1731656
Hasanah, U., & Nurcholis, I. A. (2024). English education students’ perception of the use of ChatGPT in writing articles. Pubmedia Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 1(2), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.47134/jpbi.v1i2.298
Hutchison, A., Gutierrez, K., Colwell, J., Evmenova, A., Offutt, J., & Gross, M. (2023). Evaluating the role of professional development on elementary teachers’ knowledge, comfort, and beliefs related to teaching computer science to students with high-incidence disabilities. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(6), 1003–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2089408
Ke, F., Moon, J., & Sokolikj, Z. (2022). Virtual reality-based social skills training for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420945603
Kenny, N., Doyle, A., & Horgan, F. (2023). Transformative inclusion: Differentiating qualitative research methods to support participation for individuals with complex communication or cognitive profiles. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221146992
Knight, C., & Crick, T. (2022). Inclusive education in Wales: Interpreting discourses of values and practice using critical policy analysis. ECNU Review of Education, 5(2), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311211039858
Knott, E., Rao, A. H., Summers, K., & Teeger, C. (2022). Interviews in the social sciences. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2, Article 73. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00150-6
Kokkinos, T., & Gakis, P. (2021). Student teachers’ differentiated teaching practices for high-achieving students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(7), 916–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1827374
Lai, C. P., Zhang, W., Chang, Y. L. (2020). Differentiated instruction enhances sixth-grade students’ mathematics self-efficacy, learning motives, and problem-solving skills. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 48(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.9094
Lavidas, K., Voulgari, I., Papadakis, S., Athanassopoulos, S., Anastasiou, A., Filippidi, A., Komis, V., & Karacapilidis, N. (2024). Determinants of humanities and social sciences students’ intentions to use artificial intelligence applications for academic purposes. Information, 15(6), Article 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060314
Lian, H., Huai, M., Farh, J.-L., Huang, J.-C., Lee, C., & Chao, M. M. (2022). Leader unethical pro-organizational behavior and employee unethical conduct: Social learning of moral disengagement as a behavioral principle. Journal of Management, 48(2), 350–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320959699
Lindner, K. T., & Schwab, S. (2020). Differentiation and individualisation in inclusive education: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. International Journal of Inclusive Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1813450
Luger, G. F. (2021). Modern AI and how we got here. In Knowing our world: An artificial intelligence perspective (pp. 49–74). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71873-2_3
Luoma, T., & Kosunen, S. (2024). Participation and educational conservatism among lower secondary school students in a disadvantaged neighborhood in Finland: A request for visible pedagogies. Peabody Journal of Education, 99(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2024.2307797
Malberg, N. T. (2021). Working with autistic children and their families from a mentalization based therapy for children (MBT-C) approach. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 18(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/1551806X.2021.1845033
Mather, N., White, J., & Youman, M. (2020). Dyslexia around the world: A snapshot. Learning Disabilities, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2020-V25-I1-9552
McQuillan, M., & Mayo, C. (2024). School leaders and transphobia: Direct, facilitative, accommodative, and resistant forms of gender-based bias and bullying. Educational Administration Quarterly, 60(1), 37–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X231217747
Moorhouse, B. L., & Tiet, M. C. (2021). Attempting to implement a pedagogy of care during the disruptions to teacher education caused by COVID-19: A collaborative self-study. Studying Teacher Education, 17(2), 208–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2021.1925644
Morrow, E. (2023). Music reading for students with learning disabilities. American String Teacher, 73(4), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031313231197638
Nam, B. H., English, A. S., Li, X., Hanh Van, H., & Nyman, J. K. (2023). Subjectivities and the future of comparative and international education: Teacher researchers and graduate student researchers as co-constructive narrative inquirers. Educational Review, 76(5), 1093–1112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2159934
O’Connor, S. L., Ezell, J. A. & Roberts, J. (2019). Review of the complexity of autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology, 5, 52–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40817-019-00064-4
Onal, S., & Kulavuz-Onal, D. (2024). A cross-disciplinary examination of the instructional uses of ChatGPT in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(3), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231196532
Patterson, D. R., & Hicks, S. C. (2020). Teaching math vocabulary in small groups to youth with autism. Teaching Exceptional Children, 52(6), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059920924688
Pozas, M., Letzel, V., & Schneider, C. (2020). Teachers and differentiated instruction: Exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12481
Price, K. M., Wigg, K. G., Misener, V. L., Clarke, A., Yeung, N., Blokland, K., Wilkinson, M., Kerr, E. N., Guger, S. L., Lovett, M. W., & Barr, C. L. (2022). Language difficulties in school-age children with developmental dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(3), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194211006207
Puzio, K., Colby, G. T., & Algeo-Nichols, D. (2020). Differentiated literacy instruction: Boondoggle or best practice? Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 459–498. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933536
Renger, S., & Macaskill, A. (2021). Developing the foundations for a learning-based humanistic therapy. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678211007668
Rizos, I., & Adam, M. (2022). Mathematics students’ conceptions and reactions to questions concerning the nature of rational and irrational numbers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), Article em0686. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11977
Rizos, I., & Foykas, E. (2023a). How can we help a student with Asperger syndrome to avoid the illusion of linearity? Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 4(2), Article ep23021. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/13404
Rizos, I., & Foykas, E. (2023b). Utilization of “Byrne’s Euclid” in the teaching of geometry to students with special learning difficulties: A qualitative research. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.2.623
Rizos, I., & Gkrekas, N. (2023). Incorporating history of mathematics in open-ended problem solving: An empirical study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), Article em2242. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13025
Rosello, R., Martinez-Raga, J., Mira, A., Pastor, J. C., Solmi, M., & Cortese, S. (2022). Cognitive, social, and behavioral manifestations of the co-occurrence of autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review. Autism, 26(4), 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211065545
Rowan, L., Bourke, T., L’Estrange, L., Lunn Brownlee, J., Ryan, M., Walker, S., & Churchward, P. (2021). How does initial teacher education research frame the challenge of preparing future teachers for student diversity in schools? A systematic review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 91(1), 112–158. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320979171
Ruppar, A., Kurth, J., Bubash, S., & Lockman Turner, E. (2023). A framework for preparing to teach students with extensive support needs in the 21^st century. Teacher Education and Special Education, 46(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064211059853
Sánchez-Ruiz, L. M., Moll-López, S., Nuñez-Pérez, A., Moraño-Fernández, J. A., & Vega-Fleitas, E. (2023). ChatGPT Challenges blended learning methodologies in engineering education: A case study in mathematics. Applied Sciences, 13(10), Article 6039. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106039
Scarparolo, G., & MacKinnon, S. (2022). Student voice as part of differentiated instruction: students’ perspectives. Educational Review, 76(4), 774–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2047617
Servant-Miklos, V., & Noordegraaf-Eelens, L. (2021). Toward social-transformative education: An ontological critique of self-directed learning. Critical Studies in Education, 62(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1577284
Sharma, S., & Yadav, R. (2023). ChatGPT–A technological remedy or challenge for education system. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 14(4), 46–51.
Sharp, K., Jarvis, J. M., & McMillan, J. M. (2020). Leadership for differentiated instruction: Teachers’ engagement with on-site professional learning at an Australian secondary school. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(8), 901–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1492639
Siegle, D. (2023). A role for ChatGPT and AI in gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 46(3), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175231168443
Singer, J. B., Báez, J. C., & Rios, J. A. (2023). AI creates the message: Integrating AI language learning models into social work education and practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 59(2), 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2023.2189878
Strzelecki, A. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
Theocharopoulos, P. C., Anagnostou, P., Tsoukala, A., Georgakopoulos, S. V., Tasoulis, S. K., & Plagianakos, V. P. (2023). Detection of fake generated scientific abstracts. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 9^th International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (pp. 33–39). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDataService58306.2023.00011
Theocharopoulos, P. C., Georgakopoulos, S. V., Tasoulis, S. K., & Plagianakos, V. P. (2024). Who writes the review, human or AI? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.20285
Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203
Tomlinson, S. (2012). The irresistible rise of the SEN industry. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.692055
van’t Hof, M., Tisseur, C., van Berckelear-Onnes, I., van Nieuwenhuyzen, A., Daniels, A. M., Deen, M., Hoek, H. W., & Ester, W. A. (2021). Age at autism spectrum disorder diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis from 2012 to 2019. Autism, 25(4), 862–873. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361320971107
Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), Article em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272
Yaroshenko, O. M., Anisimova, H. V., Koliesnik, T. V., Kaplina, H. A., & Babych, N. O. (2024). National strategy for a barrier-free environment: Problems, tolerance and implementation. International Social Work, 67(1), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728221126002

Citation

Rizos, I., Foykas, E., & Georgakopoulos, S. V. (2024). Enhancing mathematics education for students with special educational needs through generative AI: A case study in Greece. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4), ep535. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15487

Rizos, I., Foykas, E., and Georgakopoulos, S. V. (2024). Enhancing mathematics education for students with special educational needs through generative AI: A case study in Greece. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4), ep535. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15487

Rizos I, Foykas E, Georgakopoulos SV. Enhancing mathematics education for students with special educational needs through generative AI: A case study in Greece. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2024;16(4), ep535. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15487

Rizos, Ioannis, Evaggelos Foykas, and Spiros V. Georgakopoulos. "Enhancing mathematics education for students with special educational needs through generative AI: A case study in Greece". Contemporary Educational Technology 2024 16 no. 4 (2024): ep535. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15487

Rizos, Ioannis et al. "Enhancing mathematics education for students with special educational needs through generative AI: A case study in Greece". Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 16, no. 4, 2024, ep535. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15487

Rizos I, Foykas E, Georgakopoulos SV. Enhancing mathematics education for students with special educational needs through generative AI: A case study in Greece. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2024;16(4):ep535. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15487