Effects of the Application of STEM Curriculum Integration Model to Living Technology Teaching on Business School Students’ Learning Effectiveness

Sri Gunawan; Chich-Jen Shieh

doi:10.30935/cedtech/8583

Sri Gunawan ¹ ^* , Chich-Jen Shieh ²

More Detail

CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, Volume 12, Issue 2, Article No: ep279

https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8583

OPEN ACCESS 2569 Views 1386 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Learning area integrated teaching, teaching unit topics and the contents of various subjects with team teaching and cooperative learning to have students learn better integrated concepts, is emphasized domestically. Nevertheless, it is discovered that subject-specific teaching is still used in living technology teaching area. The integration and application of knowledge content learned in classes could enhance the problem solving opportunity.
To effectively achieve research objectives and test research hypotheses, nonequivalent test experimental design is applied to the experimental research in this study. Aiming at 312 business school students of Parahyangan Catholic University (UNPAR), Indonesia, as the experimental objects, the research results are summarized as below. 1. STEM curriculum integration model presents significant effects on learning effect. 2. STEM curriculum integration model shows remarkable effects on learning gain. 3. Living technology teaching reveals notable effects on learning effect. 4. Living technology teaching appears significant effects on learning gain. 5. STEM curriculum integration model integrated living technology teaching presents remarkable effects on learning effect. 6. STEM curriculum integration model integrated living technology teaching shows notable effects on the promotion of learning gain. According to the results to propose suggestions, it is expected to have students analyze problems from more aspects and develop diverse solving strategies to effectively enhance living technology learning effectiveness.

Keywords: STEM curriculum, living technology teaching, business school, learning effectiveness

References

Barak, M., & Assal, M. (2018). Robotics and STEM learning: students’ achievements in assignments according to the P3 Task Taxonomy—practice, problem solving, and projects. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9385-9
Chalmers, C., Carter, M. L., Cooper, T., & Nason, R. (2017). Implementing “big ideas” to advance the teaching and learning of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9799-1
Ching, Y.-H., Hsu, Y.-C., & Baldwin, S. (2018). Developing Computational Thinking with Educational Technologies for Young Learners. TechTrends, 62(6), 563-573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0292-7
Choi, J., Lee, Y., & Lee, E. (2017). Puzzle based algorithm learning for cultivating computational thinking. Wireless Personal Communications, 93(1), 131-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3679-9
Chou, P.-N. (2018). Skill development and knowledge acquisition cultivated by maker education: Evidence from Arduino-based educational robotics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), em1600. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93483
Danielle B. D., & Farran D. C. (2018). Positive early math experiences for African American boys: Nurturing the next generation of STEAM majors. Young Children, 73(2).
Denning, P. J. (2017). Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 60(6), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998438
Donegan-Ritter, M. (2017). STEM for ALL Children: Preschool Teachers Supporting Engagement of Children with Special Needs in Physical Science Learning Centers. Young Exceptional Children, 20(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250614566541
English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x
Fan, S.-C., & Yu, K.-C. (2017). How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 107-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9328-x
Hsu, T.-C., Chang, S.-C., & Hung, Y.-T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126, 296-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004
Hummell, L. J. D. T. E. (2018). Community connections. Children’s Technology and Engineering, 22(3), 12-15.
Jackson, C. D., & Mohr-Schroeder, M. J. (2018). Increasing Stem Literacy Via an Informal Learning Environment. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 53(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.30707/JSTE53.1Jackson
Kale, U., Akcaoglu, M., Cullen, T., Goh, D., Devine, L., Calvert, N., & Grise, K. (2018). Computational What? Relating Computational Thinking to Teaching. TechTrends, 62(6), 574-584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0290-9
Lai, C.-S. (2018). Using Inquiry-Based Strategies for Enhancing Students’ STEM Education Learning. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 4(1), 110-117.
So, H. J., Ryoo, D., Park, H., & Choi, H. (2019). What Constitutes Korean Pre-service Teachers’ Competency in STEAM Education: Examining the Multi-functional Structure. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0410-5
Su, J. M., & Lin, T. W. (2018). Building a Simulated Blockly-Arduino-Based Programming Learning Tool: A Preliminary Study. In 2018 7th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), Yonago, Tottori, Japan (pp. 378-381). https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2018.00082
Techakosit, S., & Nilsook, P. (2018). The Development of STEM Literacy Using the Learning Process of Scientific Imagineering through AR. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 13(1), 230-238. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i01.7664
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
Wing, J. M. (2017). Computational thinking’s influence on research and education for all. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/922

Citation

Gunawan, S., & Shieh, C.-J. (2020). Effects of the Application of STEM Curriculum Integration Model to Living Technology Teaching on Business School Students’ Learning Effectiveness. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep279. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8583

Gunawan, S., and Shieh, C.-J. (2020). Effects of the Application of STEM Curriculum Integration Model to Living Technology Teaching on Business School Students’ Learning Effectiveness. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep279. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8583

Gunawan S, Shieh CJ. Effects of the Application of STEM Curriculum Integration Model to Living Technology Teaching on Business School Students’ Learning Effectiveness. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2020;12(2), ep279. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8583

Gunawan, Sri, and Chich-Jen Shieh. "Effects of the Application of STEM Curriculum Integration Model to Living Technology Teaching on Business School Students’ Learning Effectiveness". Contemporary Educational Technology 2020 12 no. 2 (2020): ep279. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8583

Gunawan, Sri et al. "Effects of the Application of STEM Curriculum Integration Model to Living Technology Teaching on Business School Students’ Learning Effectiveness". Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 12, no. 2, 2020, ep279. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8583

Gunawan S, Shieh CJ. Effects of the Application of STEM Curriculum Integration Model to Living Technology Teaching on Business School Students’ Learning Effectiveness. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2020;12(2):ep279. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8583