E-Book versus Printed Materials: Preferences of University Students

Gonca Cumaoglu; Esra Sacici; Kerem Torun

doi:10.30935/cedtech/6096

Gonca Cumaoglu ¹ ^*, Esra Sacici ¹, Kerem Torun ¹

More Detail

CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp. 121-135

https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6096

OPEN ACCESS 2564 Views 4488 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Reading habits, accessing resources, and material preferences change rapidly in a digital world. University students, as digital natives, are accessing countless resources, from lecture notes to research papers electronically. The change of reading habits with a great scale has led to differentiation on accessibility of resources, archiving them and usage of related technologies. The purpose of this study is to examine the e-book usage preferences versus printed material along with reading habits in a context of different variables. Additionally, different uses of e-books in a variety of faculties have been the focus of this study. The participants comprised of 222 students, studying in 36 different universities across Turkey. A questionnaire was developed specifically for the study. The questionnaire consisted of three parts: Printed book reading habits, e-book reading habits (methods of reaching e-books, aim of usage etc.), and technological knowledge (e-book related tools and file formats etc.). According to the results of study, approximately 68% of university students stated that they read one book in a week and 62% indicated that they are e-book readers. Moreover, there was a significant relationship between social environment and reading habits of students. University students put forward accessibility advantage (68%) of e-book and stated that they mostly read e-book for research (81%). E-book format which is most commonly preferred among students is Portable Document Format (pdf) (73%), while the computer is the most commonly used e-book medium (60%).

Keywords: E-book, Printed material, Reading preferences, Reading habits, University students, Higher education

References

Annand, D. (2008). Learning efficacy and cost-effectiveness of print versus e-book instructional material in an introductory financial accounting course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(2), 152-164.
Armstrong, C.J., Edwards, L., & Lonsdale, R. (2002). Virtually there? E-books in UK academic libraries. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 36(4), 216-27.
Cassidy, E. D., Martinez, M., & Shen, L. ( 2012). Not in love, or not in the know? Graduate student and faculty use (and non-use) of e-books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(6), 326– 332.
Christianson, M. (2005). Patterns of use of electronic books. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 29, 351-363.
Evans, J. R. & Mathur, A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15(2), 195-219.
İsmail, R. & Zainab, A. N. (2005). The pattern of e-book use amongst undergraduates ın Malaysia: A case of to know is to use. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 10(2), 1-23.
Letchumanan, M. & Tarmizi, R. A. Utilization of e-book among university mathematics students. (2010). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 580–587.
Mischo, W. H., Norman, M. A., Shelburne, W. A., & Schlembach, M. C. (2007). The growth of electronic journals in libraries. Science & Technology Libraries, 26(3/4), 29-59.
Muir, L. & Hawes, G. (2013). The case for e-book literacy: Undergraduate students' experience with e-books for course work. The Journal of Academic Librarianship (Articles in press). Available at: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib/2013.01.002
Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Clark, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H. R., & Olle, C. (2008). UK scholarly e- book usage: A landmark survey. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 60(4), 311-334.
Ntvmsnbc (2012). E-kitap kâğıdı geçti. Retrieved 25 August 2012 from http://www.ntvmsnbc.com/ id/25372204.
Resnick, R. M. (2012). Comparison of postal and online surveys: Cost, speed, response rates and reliability. Education Market Research and MCH Strategic Data. Available at: https:// f6495f0e992a958132f3bbdab404e70f099b18ec72f5a527f500.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/cms/wp- content/uploads/2012/10/Comparison_of_Postal_and_Online_Surveys.pdf
Rosso, S. (2009). What are ebooks? Advantages and disadvantages of electronic books. Retrieved on 5 March 2012 from http://whenihavetime.com/2009/03/09/what-are-ebooks- advantages-and-disadvantages-of-electronic-books/#advantages.
Shelburne, W. A. (2009). E-book usage in an academic library: User attitudes and behaviors. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 33, 59–72.
Slater, R (2009). E-books or print books, “big deals” or local selections—What gets more use?, Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 33, 31-41.
Sprague, N. & Hunter, B (2009). Assessing e-books: Taking a closer look at e-book statistics. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 32, 150–157.
Szapkiw, A. J. R., Courduff, J. C., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2013).Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students’ learning Computers & Education, 63, 259–266.
University of Liverpool eBook Study (2010). A Survey of eBook usage and perceptions at the University of Liverpool (White Paper). Available at: http://www.springer.com/cda/ content/document/cda_downloaddocument/V7671+Liverpool+White+Paper+Part2.pdf?SG WID=0-0-45-1037538-0
Vasileiou, M., Rowley, J., & Hartley, R., (2012). The e-book management framework: The management of e-books in academic libraries and its challenges. Library & Information Science Research, 34, 282-291.
Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55, 945–948.
Zhang, Y. & Beckman, R. (2011). E-book usage among chemists, biochemists and biologists: Findings of a survey and interviews. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 65. Available at: http://www.istl.org/11-spring/article2.html

Citation

Cumaoglu, G., Sacici, E., & Torun, K. (2013). E-Book versus Printed Materials: Preferences of University Students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(2), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6096

Cumaoglu, G., Sacici, E., and Torun, K. (2013). E-Book versus Printed Materials: Preferences of University Students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(2), pp. 121-135. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6096

Cumaoglu G, Sacici E, Torun K. E-Book versus Printed Materials: Preferences of University Students. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2013;4(2), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6096

Cumaoglu, Gonca, Esra Sacici, and Kerem Torun. "E-Book versus Printed Materials: Preferences of University Students". Contemporary Educational Technology 2013 4 no. 2 (2013): 121-135. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6096

Cumaoglu, Gonca et al. "E-Book versus Printed Materials: Preferences of University Students". Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, 2013, pp. 121-135. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6096

Cumaoglu G, Sacici E, Torun K. E-Book versus Printed Materials: Preferences of University Students. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2013;4(2):121-35. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6096