A systematic review of changing conceptual to practice in learning experience design: Text mining and bibliometric analysis

Warakon Phommanee; Boonrat Plangsorn; Sutithep Siripipattanakul

doi:10.30935/cedtech/13480

Warakon Phommanee ¹, Boonrat Plangsorn ¹ ^* , Sutithep Siripipattanakul ¹

More Detail

CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, Volume 15, Issue 4, Article No: ep453

https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13480

Submitted: 17 April 2023, Published Online: 14 July 2023

OPEN ACCESS 1712 Views 1208 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Learning experience design (LXD) is a new wave in educational technology and learning design. This study was conducted to clarify conceptual change to practice by applying a systematic literature review to a combination text mining and bibliometric analysis technique to visualization network. Based on the study selection articles from SCOPUS. Our research questions focused on the changing concept, the elements of dimensionality, and the process or practice of LXD. The findings showed that 152 articles were finally selected to be analyzed. Conceptualizing LXD is currently underway in design thinking and user research methods with emphasis on the empathize process. Moreover, three dimensions to consider including (1) design dimension focus on user experience design in a technology context, (2) learning dimension focus on instructional design and learning theory, and (3) standard dimension focus on assessment and evaluation in learning goal and project management. In addition, five steps cycle for practice follows: research learners as users and learning goals, design with ideate, develop prototyping, validity testing, and launch and follow-up. These factors enhance learning engagement and aesthetics for a great learner experience and learning efficacy.

Keywords: conceptual to practice, learning experience design, systematic review, text data, bibliometric analysis

References

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Auernhammer, J., & Roth, B. (2021). The origin and evolution of Stanford University’s design thinking: From product design to design thinking in innovation management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(6), 623-644. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12594
Austin, R. (2019). How combining design thinking and ADDIE creates the ultimate learning experience. elearningindustry.com. https://elearningindustry.com/design-thinking-and-addie-create-ultimate-learning-experience
Babich, N. (2020). The UX design process: Everything you need to know. https://xd.adobe.com/ideas/guides/ux-design-process-steps/
Batoufflet, M. (2019). Learning experience design is coming. https://medium.com/@MBatoufflet/learning-experience-design-is-coming-3a74b1e4ead6
Bongard-Blanchy, K., & Bouchard, C. (2014). Dimensions of user experience from the product design perspective. Journal d’Interaction Personne-Système [Person-System Interaction Journal], 3(1). https://doi.org/10.46298/jips.1284
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE.
Center for Contemporary Social and Cultural Studies. (2019). Digital studies and the future of Thai society. Faculty of Sociology and Anthropology, Thammasat University. https://socanth.tu.ac.th/ccscs/digital-sea/digital-studies-seminar/
Chang, Y. K., & Kuwata, J. (2020). Learning experience design: Challenges for novice designers. In M. Schmidt, A. A. Tawfik, I. Jahnke, & Y. Earnshaw (Eds.), Learner and user experience research: An introduction for the field of learning design & technology. EdTech Books.
Cooper, H. (1988). Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in Society, 1, 104-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03177550
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Emmanuel, M., Okeke-Uzodike, O., & Emmanuel, E. (2021). Quality attributes for an LMS cognitive model for user experience design and evaluation of learning management systems. In Proceedings of the 3^rd International Conference on Integrated Intelligent Computing Communication & Security (pp. 234-242). https://doi.org/10.2991/ahis.k.210913.029
Floor, N. (2018). Fundamentals of learning experience design. https://lxd.org/fundamentals-of-learning-experience-design/
Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design. Thomson Wadsworth. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140440211
Google. (2022). Professional certificate with UX design courses. coursera.org. https://www.coursera.org/learn/foundations-user-experience-design/home/week/1
Gray, C. M., Parsons, P., Toombs, A. L., Rasche, N., & Vorvoreanu, M. (2020). Designing an aesthetic learner experience: UX, instructional design, and design pedagogy. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 11(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v11i1.26065
Jahnke, I., Schmidt, M., Pham, M., & Singh, K. (2020). Pedagogical usability for designing and evaluating learner experience in technology enhanced environments. In M. Schmidt, A. A. Tawfik, I. Jahnke, & Y. Earnshaw (Eds.), Learner and user experience research: An introduction for the field of learning design & technology. EdTech Books. https://doi.org/10.59668/36
Joanna Briggs Institute. (2015). Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual 2015: Methodology for JBI scoping reviews. Joanna Briggs Institute.
Joshi, S., & Sharma, S. K. (2021). A model for good learning environment using learning data analytics. Procedia Computer Science, 194, 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.10.069
Kew, S. N., & Tasir, Z. (2022). Learning analytics in online learning environment: A systematic review on the focuses and the types of student-related analytics data. Technology Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 405-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09541-2
Kilgore, W. (2016). UX to LX: The rise of learner experience design. idesignedu.org. https://www.idesignedu.org/latest-news/ux-to-lx-the-rise-of-learner-experience-design
Konstantakis, M., Aliprantis, J., Teneketzis, A., & Caridakis, G. (2018). Understanding user eXperience aspects in cultural heritage interaction. In Proceedings of the 22^nd Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics (pp. 267-271). https://doi.org/10.1145/3291533.3291580
Kovatcheva, E. (2018). User experience design models for internet of things. Serdica Journal of Computing, 12(1-2), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.55630/sjc.2018.12.65-82
Kraus, L. (2017). User experience with mobile security and privacy mechanisms [Doctoral thesis, Technische Universität Berlin]. https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-6029
Kraus, S., Breier, M., Lim, W. M., Dabic, M., Kumar, S., Kanbach, D., Mukherjee, D., Corvello, V., Pineiro-Chousa, J., Liguori, E., Palacios-Marques, D., Schiavone, F., Ferraris, A., Fernandes, C., & Ferreira, J. J. (2022). Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science, 16(8), 2577-2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8
Leydesdorff, L., & Nerghes, A. (2017). Co‐word maps and topic modeling: A comparison using small and medium‐sized corpora (N<1,000). Journal of the Association for Information Science Technology, 68(4), 1024-1035. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23740
Li, J., & Jiang, Y. (2021). The research trend of big data in education and the impact of teacher psychology on educational development during COVID-19: A systematic review and future perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753388
Li, S., Singh, K., Riedel, N., Yu, F., & Jahnke, I. (2022). Digital learning experience design and research of a self-paced online course for risk-based inspection of food imports. Food Control, 135, 108698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108698
Malamed, C. (2018). 5 steps to using design thinking in learning experience design. Association for Talent Development. https://www.td.org/insights/5-steps-to-using-design-thinking-in-learning-experience-design
Manocham, S., Saini, P., Vidyapeeth, B., & Manocha, S. (2022). Insights of big data analytics in education–Challenges & opportunities: A review paper. International Management Review, 18, 20-26.
Mwakalinga, S., & Leandry, L. (2021). Application of assessment and evaluation in learning: Theories and realities. International Journal of Education and Research, 9, 10.
Pan, J., Sheu, J., Massimo, L., Scott, K. R., & Phillips, A. W. (2021). Learning experience design in health professions education: A conceptual review of evidence for educators. AEM Education & Training, 5(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10505
Raynis, M. (2018). Analysis of instructional design job announcements (2016). Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 4, 1.
Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2018). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Pearson.
Remiker, D., & Hourigan, J. (2019). 5 steps to learning experience design. NovoEd.
Robinson, N., & Harrison, L. (2017). Using learner experience design (LXD) to improve digital language learning products: Research, theory, and practice. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315523293-13
Roto, V. (2019). User experience from product creation perspective. Nokia Research Center. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.146.4319&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Schmidt, M., & Huang, R. (2021). Defining learning experience design: Voices from the field of learning design & technology. TechTrends, 66(2), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00656-y
Schmidt, M., & Tawfik, A. A. (2022). Activity theory as a lens for developing and applying personas and scenarios in learning experience design. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.51869/111/msat
Seek. (2022). Instructional designer job growth. https://www.seek.com.au/career-advice/role/instructional-designer
Skill Source e-Learning. (2022). Areas of expertise: Learning experience design. https://skillsourcelearning.com/learning-experience-design/
Sottilare, R. (2018). Community models to enhance adaptive instruction. HCII Augmented Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91470-1_8
Soulis, S., Nicolettou, A., & Seitzinger, J. (2017). Using learner experience design (LX) for program enhancement. Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia Conference Expanding Horizons in Open & Distance Learning.
Stanford University. (2022). Creativity and design thinking. https://online.stanford.edu/professional-education/creativity-and-design-thinking
Stefaniak, J., Shah, S., Mills, E., & Luo, T. (2020). Keeping the learner at the focal point: The use of needs assessment and persona construction to develop an instructional resource center for instructional designer. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 11(2), 142-155. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v11i2.25632
Stern, C. (2014). CUBI: A user experience model for project success. https://uxmag.com/articles/cubi-a-user-experience-model-for-project-success
Stevens, E. (2021). The fascinating history of UX design: A definitive timeline. https://careerfoundry.com/en/blog/ux-design/the-fascinating-history-of-ux-design-a-definitive-timeline/
Thurber, D. (2021). Designing learning experiences for the future of learning in the digital age: A proposed framework. Current Issues in Education, 22(1), 1-18.
Troop, M., White, D., Wilson, K. E., & Zeni, P. (2020). The user experience design for learning (UXDL) framework: The undergraduate student perspective. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 11(3), 25-28. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.3.8328
UNESCO. (2013). IBE glossary of curriculum terminology. UNESCO International Bureau of Education. http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/document/glossary-curriculum-terminology
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2022). VOSviewer manual for VOSviewer version 1 .6.18. Center for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University. https://www.vosviewer.com/
West, D., Allman, B., Hunsaker, E., & Kimmons, R. (2022). Visual aesthetics. In R. Kimmons, & S. Yamada (Eds.), Visuals in learning design.
World Economic Forum. (2021). Digital learning can help us close the global education gap. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/01/think-education-is-a-matter-for-governments-alone-think-again
World Economic Forum. (2022). Opinion: EdTech has not lived up to its promises–here’s how to turn that around. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/07/edtech-has-not-lived-up-to-its-promises-heres-how-to-turn-that-around/

Citation

Phommanee, W., Plangsorn, B., & Siripipattanakul, S. (2023). A systematic review of changing conceptual to practice in learning experience design: Text mining and bibliometric analysis. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep453. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13480

Phommanee, W., Plangsorn, B., and Siripipattanakul, S. (2023). A systematic review of changing conceptual to practice in learning experience design: Text mining and bibliometric analysis. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep453. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13480

Phommanee W, Plangsorn B, Siripipattanakul S. A systematic review of changing conceptual to practice in learning experience design: Text mining and bibliometric analysis. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2023;15(4), ep453. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13480

Phommanee, Warakon, Boonrat Plangsorn, and Sutithep Siripipattanakul. "A systematic review of changing conceptual to practice in learning experience design: Text mining and bibliometric analysis". Contemporary Educational Technology 2023 15 no. 4 (2023): ep453. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13480

Phommanee, Warakon et al. "A systematic review of changing conceptual to practice in learning experience design: Text mining and bibliometric analysis". Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 15, no. 4, 2023, ep453. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13480

Phommanee W, Plangsorn B, Siripipattanakul S. A systematic review of changing conceptual to practice in learning experience design: Text mining and bibliometric analysis. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2023;15(4):ep453. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13480