Effects of feedback dynamics and mixed gamification on cognitive underachievement in school

Jhon Holguin-Alvarez; Juana Cruz-Montero; Jenny Ruiz-Salazar; Raquel Leonor Atoche Wong; Irene Merino-Flores

doi:10.30935/cedtech/15717

Jhon Holguin-Alvarez ¹ ^* , Juana Cruz-Montero ², Jenny Ruiz-Salazar ³, Raquel Leonor Atoche Wong ³, Irene Merino-Flores ²

More Detail

CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, Volume 17, Issue 1, Article No: ep551

https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15717

Submitted: 23 July 2024, Published Online: 12 December 2024

OPEN ACCESS 336 Views 198 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

The application of gamification methods is still complex for most Latin American teachers who apply gamified pedagogies. Many confuse their nature with cognitivist classes that are totally confusing when using gamified tools for active learning of their students. The background information states the reduction of academic obstacles for students to perform at a high level, especially when participating in an interactive and combinatorial way with gamification technologies offered by the teacher. We tested the effects of the D-S-F_[IR] proposal (dynamics, strategies, feedback, and interactive reinforcement), replicating gamified pedagogical phases with virtual applications, the use of video games in academic underachievement; and a follow-up verbal interactive reinforcement. The method made it possible to develop between 1,600 and 1,800 verbal didactic interactions of knowledge (orientation, questioning, and reassuring). The approach consisted of 60 reinforcement sessions (± 8 months of implementation), for 140 students with low cognitive performance at school (range_[age] = 8.5-12.5), who were previously selected and randomly assigned to three comparison groups (EG_[1] = 47; EG_[2] = 47; CG = 46). The results were evidenced by performance tests, reporting significant improvements in mathematics cognitive performance (F = 53.316; p < 0.05). A specific analysis of performance in science and communication allowed for significant improvement (F = 93.119; F = 85.770; p < 0.05), although no differentiating effects were evident between the experimental groups. It is important to conclude that mixed gamification was responsible for the reduction of the low level of school cognitive performance.

Keywords: gamified learning, cognitive processes, learning to read, mathematical skills, scientific competences

References

AlDahdouh, A. A. (2021). Information search behavior in fragile and conflict-affected learning contexts. The Internet and Higher Education, 50, Article 100808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100808
Aldemir, T., Celik, B., & Kaplan, G. (2018). A qualitative investigation of student perceptions of game elements in a gamified course. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.001
Amodia-Bidakowska, A., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2023). Disciplinary dialogues: Exploring the association between classroom dialogue and learning outcomes within and between subjects in English primary schools. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 43, Article 100742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100742
Andrade, A. P. & Guerrero, L. A. / Development Analysis Group (GRADE). (2021). Aprendo en Casa: Balance and Recommendations [Learn at home: Balance and recommendations]. GRADE.
Andriani, A., Dewi, I., & Sagala, P. N. (2019). Development of blended learning media using the mentimeter application to improve mathematics creative thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188, Article 012112. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012112
Apascaritei, P., Radl, J., & Swarr, M. (2024). Material incentives moderate gender differences in cognitive effort among children. Learning and Individual Differences, 114, Article 102494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102494
Arrieta Mier, M. E., Mieles, J. J., Gonzáles Roys, G. A. (2023). El juego. Una estrategia didáctica para fortalecer el proceso lector [The game. A teaching strategy to strengthen the reading process]. Revista Criterios, 30(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.31948/rev.criterios/30.1-art4
Bacso, S. A., & Nilsen, E. S. (2022). Children’s use of verbal and nonverbal feedback during communicative repair: Associations with executive functioning and emotion knowledge. Cognitive Development, 63, Article 101199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101199
Bakhanova, E., Garcia, J. A., Raffe, W. L., & Voinov, A. (2020). Targeting social learning and engagement: What serious games and gamification can offer to participatory modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 134, Article 104846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104846
Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2017). Studying student differentiation in gamified education: A long-term study. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 550–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.049
Baydas, O., & Cicek, M. (2019). The examination of the gamification process in undergraduate education: A scale development study. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 8(3), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1580609
Behl, A., Jayawardena, N., Bhardwaj, S., Pereira, V., del Giudice, M., & Zhang, J. (2024). Examining the failure of gamification in implementing innovation from the perspective of problematization in the retail sectors of emerging economies. Technovation, 129, Article 102902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102902
Berry, D. N., Taylor, M. L., Nicolai, K. D., Koenka, A. C., Barnes, N., De Oliveira, L. C., & Zumbrunn, S. (2025). Reading and writing feedback perceptions among multilingual and monolingual learners across K-20 contexts: A systematic review. Learning and Instruction, 95, Article 102022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102022
Bortz, G., & Garrido, S. (2024). New tools to analyze participation dynamics in local development projects. Reflexiones, 103(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.15517/rr.v103i1.50707
Byl, E., & Topping, K. J. (2023). Student perceptions of feedback in reciprocal or nonreciprocal peer tutoring or mentoring. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 79, Article 101304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101304
Cadet, M. J. (2023). Application of game-based online learning platform: Kahoot a formative evaluation tool to assess learning. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 18(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2023.03.009
Cassum, L. A., & Fatima, S. S. (2024). E-gaming: An active learning pedagogy for engaging learners in a private university in Karachi, Pakistan. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 74(7), 1321–1324. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.9765
Cattoni, A., Anderle, F., Venuti, P., & Pasqualotto, A. (2024). How to improve reading and writing skills in primary schools: A comparison between gamification and pen-and-paper training. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 39, Article 100633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100633
Chen, C. Y. (2024). Flipped classroom with case-based learning for improving preservice teachers’ classroom management learning outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 152, Article 104785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104785
Chen, P. Z., Chang, T. C., & Wu, C. L. (2020). Effects of gamified classroom management on the divergent thinking and creative tendency of elementary students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, Article 100664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100664
Christensen, T. B., Halshov, K., & Kolkmose, C. (2019). The properties of sticky notes for collaborative creativity: An introduction, In B. T. Christensen, K. Halshov, & C. Kolkmose (Eds.), Sticky creativity (pp. 1–6). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816566-9.00001-X
Contreras, M. I., García Bauza, C., & Santos, G. (2019). Videogame-based tool for learning in the motor, cognitive and socio-emotional domains for children with intellectual disability. Entertainment Computing, 30, Article 100301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2019.100301
Dainer-Best, J., & Rubin, M. (2024). Guided feedback in an online text-based game impacts activity choices. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, 16, Article 100738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100738
Dalsgaard, P., Halshov, K., & Nylandsted, C. (2020). A study of a digital sticky note design environment. In B. T. Christensen, K. Halshov, & Kolkmose C (Eds.), Sticky creativity (pp. 155–174). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816566-9.00007-0
Davies, K. F., Clarke, S., Martins, R., Rudd, J. R., & Duncan, M. (2024). The effect of a home-based, gamified stability skills intervention on 4-5-year-old children’s physical and cognitive outcomes: A pilot study. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 73, Article 102636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102636
De Carolis, B., De Gemmis, M., Lops, P., & Palestra, G. (2017). Recognizing users feedback from non-verbal communicative acts in conversational recommender systems. Pattern Recognition Letters, 99(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2017.06.011
Delgado, J., Espinoza, M., Vivanco, C., Medina, N., & Ayala, M. (2023). Gamification as a motivating axis for learning mathematics. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(1), 3928–3949. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i1.538
Delgado, M. Y., Wheeler, L. A., Perez-Brena, N., & Nair, R. L. (2021). The associations of maternal/paternal modeling, self-efficacy, and ethnic fit on math/science achievement among Latinx students. Journal of Adolescence, 92, 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.08.013
Delprato, M., & Akyeampong, K. (2019). The effect of working on students’ learning in Latin America: Evidence from the learning survey TERCE. International Journal of Educational Development, 70, Article 102086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102086
Demedts, F., Kiili, K., Ninaus, M., Lindstedt, A., Reynvoet, B., Sasanguie, D., & Depaepe, F. (2024). The effectiveness of explanatory adaptive feedback within a digital educational game to enhance fraction understanding. Learning and Instruction, 94, Article 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101976
Di Giacomo, D., Ranieri, J., & Lacasa, P. (2017). Digital learning as enhanced learning processing? Cognitive evidence for new insight of smart learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01329
Duval, R. (2016). Un análisis cognitivo de problemas de comprensión en el aprendizaje de las matemáticas [A cognitive analysis of comprehension problems in mathematics learning]. In R. Duval, & A. Sáenz-Ludlow (Eds.), Comprensión y aprendizaje en matemáticas: Perspectivas semióticas seleccionadas (pp. 61–94). Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Colombia.
El Shemy, I., Jaccheri, L., Giannakos, M., & Vulchanova, M. (2025). Participatory design of augmented reality games for word learning in autistic children: The parental perspective. Entertainment Computing, 52, Article 100756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100756
Elisha Ding, A. C., & Yu, C. H. (2024). Serious game-based learning and learning by making games: Types of game-based pedagogies and student gaming hours impact students’ science learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 218, Article 105075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105075
Fanari, R., Meloni C., & Massidda, D. (2017). Early numerical competence and number line task performance in kindergarteners. In Proceedings of the 14^th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age. International Association for Development of the Information Society.
Formosa, J., Johnson, D., Türkay, S., & Mandryk, R. L. (2022). Need satisfaction, passion and wellbeing effects of videogame play prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior, 131, Article 107232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107232
GCR. (2021). The “aprendo en casa” challenge: Difficulties, effects and results of a virtual education. GCR.
Gokbulut, B. (2020). The effect of Mentimeter and Kahoot applications on university students’ e-learning. World Journal on Educational Technology, 12(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v12i2.4814
Grabner-Hagen, M. M., & Kingsley, T. (2023). From badges to boss challenges: Gamification through need-supporting scaffolded design to instruct and motivate elementary learners. Computers and Education Open, 4, Article 100131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100131
Hagemann, V., & Decius, J. (2024). Does feedback type matter? The superiority of process feedback over performance feedback in interdependent teamwork. Learning and Instruction, 93, Article 101949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101949
Hardof-Jaffe, S., & Amzalag, M. (2024). Beyond school: The role of technology in K-12 students’ lives and informal learning. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 42, Article 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100692
Hervás, C., Ballesteros, C., & Corujo, M. (2018). Robotics and curriculum: Experimenting with new methodological and didactic strategies for their curricular integration. In M. Compte, E. López, M. Morales, & L. M. A. Sevilla (Eds.), Hispano-Ecuadorian investigative and innovative experiences (pp. 73–93). AFOE.
Hogan, E., & Payne, B. (2024). A mixed methods study of teachers’ use of feedback within middle school social studies classrooms to promote reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 92, Article 101938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101938
Holguin-Alvarez, J., Ruiz-Salazar, J., Manrique-Alvarez, G., Picoy Gonzales, J. A., & Holgado-Quispe, A. (2023). Mixed gamification with virtual tools modify poor school performance. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(3), 1663–1673. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i3.25530
Holguin-Alvarez, J., Taxa, F., Flores, R., & Olaya, S. (2020). Educational projects of video game gamification: Development of numerical thinking and school reasoning in vulnerable contexts. EDMETIC, 9(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v9i1.12222
Hong, Y., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2024). Approaches and game elements used to tailor digital gamification for learning: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 212, Article 105000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105000
Huang, T.-H., Liu, Y.-C., & Shiu, C.-Y. (2008). Construction of an online learning system for decimal numbers through the use of cognitive conflict strategy. Computers & Education, 50(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.03.007
Huici, C. (2019). El estudio de los grupos en psicología social [The study of groups in social psychology]. In F. Molero, D. Lois, C. García-Ael, & Á. Gómez (Eds.), Psicología de los grupos (pp. 1–5). UNED.
INEI. (2020). State of children and adolescents. INEI.
Infante-Villagrán, V. A., Dapelo, B. M. P., Cobo-Rendón, R., López-Angulo, Y., Escobar, B., & Beyle, C. (2021). Aplicativos usados e recomendações dadas por professores universitários para a autorregulação da aprendizagem no contexto da pandemia de COVID-19 [Applications used and recommendations given by university professors for self-regulation of learning in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic]. Texto Livre: Linguagem E Tecnologia, 14(3), Article e33027. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.33027
Jagušt, T., Botički, I., & So, H. J. (2018). Examining competitive, collaborative and adaptive gamification in young learners’ math learning. Computers & Education, 125, 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.022
Johnson, D., Klarkowski, M., Vella, K., Phillips, C., McEwan, M., & Watling, C. N. (2018). Greater rewards in videogames lead to more presence, enjoyment and effort. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.025
Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2017). Combining mobile technologies in environmental education: A Greek case study. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11, 108–130. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2017.084272
Keller, M. V., Dresel, M., & Daumiller, M. (2024). Do achievement goals and self-efficacy matter for feedback use? Learning and Instruction, 93, Article 101948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101948
Kooloos, C., Oolbenkkink-Marchand, H., Kaenders, R., & Heckman, G. (2023). Developing mathematical whole-class discussions: An exploratory study of teachers’ learning paths. Teaching and Teacher Education, 134, Article 104257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104257
La Rosa Feijoo, O. C., Valladares Valladares, J. A., Dias, M., Novikova, O. A., Barrientos Pacherres de Guevara, K., & Minaya Becerra, L. S. (2023). Impact of the “aprendo en casa” programme on pre-school students in the District of Corrales–Peru: An analysis from a parental perspective. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.57188/RICSO.2023.005
Link, L. A., & Sullivan, A. (2024). Improving preservice teachers’ beliefs and attitudes about mathematics and readiness to teach math. In D. Sargent, & K. Murphy (Eds.), Transforming teacher preparation through identity, development, and effective technologies (pp. 290–319). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1806-5.ch011
Liu, J. (2025). Development of interactive English e-learning video entertainment teaching environment based on virtual reality and game teaching emotion analysis. Entertainment Computing, 52, Article 100884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100884
Liu, S., Ma, G., Tewogbola, P., Gu, X., Gao, P., Dong, B., He, D., Lai, W., & Wu, Y. (2023). Game principle: Enhancing learner engagement with gamification to improve learning outcomes. Journal of Workplace Learning, 35(5), 450–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-11-2022-0160
Lopez, C. E., & Tucker, C.nS. (2017). A quantitative method for evaluating the complexity of implementing and performing game features in physically-interactive gamified applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.036
Lupiáñez, J. L., & Rico, L. (2015). Learning school mathematics. Aula: Revista de Pedagogía de la Universidad de Salamanca, 21, 41–60.
Mao, P., Cai, Z., Wang, Z., Hao, X., Fan, X., & Sun, X. (2024). The effects of dynamic and static feedback under tasks with different difficulty levels in digital game-based learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 60, Article 100923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100923
Merrick, M., & Fyfe, E. R. (2023). Feelings on feedback: Children’s emotional responses during mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 74, Article 102209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102209
MINEDU. (2017). National curriculum for basic education. MINEDU. https://www.minedu.gob.pe/curriculo/pdf/curriculo-nacional-de-la-educacion-basica.pdf
MINEDU. (2022). Normative ages. Guidance. MINEDU. https://www.gob.pe/institucion/minedu/informes-publicaciones/2742610-edades-normativas
Navarro-Ávalos, F., Nichols, A., Jehle, U., Büttner, B., & Durán-Rodas, D. (2024). EmPATHs–A serious board game to raise awareness and empathy towards vulnerable-to-exclusion groups in mobility. Journal of Transport & Health, 38, Article 101879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2024.101879
Nazari, M., & Hu, G. (2024). Novice language teachers steer their emotional vulnerabilities toward exercising agency: A dialogical-community of practice study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 152, Article 104759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104759
Nebel, S., Beege, M., Schneider, S., & Rey, G. D. (2016). The higher the score, the higher the learning outcome? Heterogeneous impacts of leaderboards and choice within educational videogames. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.042
Nicolaidou, I., Tozzi, F., & Antoniades, A. (2022). A gamified app on emotion recognition and anger management for pre-school children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 31, Article 100449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100449
Ofianto, O., Rahmi, U., Syafrini, D., & Ningsih, T. Z. (2024). Assessing historical thinking skills in high school history education: A Padlet-based approach. Journal of Education and Learning, 18(3), 881–892. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i3.21260
Oliveira, W., Toda, A., Toledo, P., Shi, L., Vassileva, J., Bittencourt, I. I., & Isotani, S. (2020). Does tailoring gamified educational systems matter? The impact on students’ flow experience. In Proceedings of the 53^rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2020.152
Ombudsman’s Office. (2020). Challenges for improving distance education and ensuring a gradual return to face-to-face classes. Defensoría del Pueblo.
Pimmer, C., Brϋhlmann, F., Odetola, T. D., Dipeolu, O., Oluwasola, O., Jӓger, J., & Ajuwon, A. J. (2021). WhatsApp for mobile learning. Effects on knowledge, resilience and isolation in the school-to-work transition. The Internet and Higher Education, 50, Article 100809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100809
Quintas, A., Bustamante, J. C., Pradas, F., & Castellar, C. (2020). Psychological effects of gamified didactics with exergames in physical education at primary schools: Results from a natural experiment. Computers & Education, 152, Article 103874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103874
Ramos García, Y. (2020). ¿Por qué el Perú debe mantener la teleeducación en tiempos de COVID-19? Oportunidades y barreras para la educación. Retos que se avecinan [Why should Peru maintain distance education in times of COVID-19? Opportunities and barriers to education. Challenges that lie ahead]. Revista de Investigaciones de la Universidad le Cordon Bleu, 7(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.36955/RIULCB.2020v7n1.006
Ros-Morente, A., Cabello, E., & Filella, G. (2018). Analysis of the effects of two gamified emotional education software’s in emotional and well-being variables in Spanish children and adolescents. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(09), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i09.7841
Salemink, E., De Jong, S. R. C., Notebaert, L., MacLeod, C., & Bockstaele, V. (2022). Gamification of cognitive bias modification for interpretations in anxiety increases training engagement and enjoyment. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 76, Article 101727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2022.101727
Sánchez San Blas, H., Sales Mendes, A., de la Iglesia, D. H., Silva, L. A., & Villarrubia González, G. (2024). A multiagent platform for promoting physical activity and learning through interactive educational games using the depth camera recognition system. Entertainment Computing, 49, Article 100629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2023.100629
Santiago, N. M., Santos, J. M., Galita, W. M., Mariano, O. R., & Adriano, R. C. (2024). Quality and sustainable education (SDG4): Usability of online educational applications in unexpected online learning implementation. Journal of Lifestyle & SDG’S Review, 4(2), Article e02388. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v4.n02.pe02388
Scolari, C. A., Winocur, R., Pereira, S., & Barreneche, C. (2018). Transmedia literacy. An introduction. Comunicación y Sociedad, 33, 7–13.
Shooken, E., Pellicone, A. J., Weintrop, D., Ketelhut, D. J., Cukier, M., Plane, J. D., & Williams-Pierce, C. (2024). Children’s approaches to solving puzzles in videogames. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 40, Article 100635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100635
Smit, R., Hess, K., Taras, A., Bachmann, P., & Dober, H. (2023). The role of interactive dialogue in students’ learning of mathematical reasoning: A quantitative multi-method analysis of feedback episodes. Learning and Instruction, 86, Article 101777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101777
Sun, L. (2025). Children’s sensory interaction music enlightenment system based on sensory interaction and game elements. Entertainment Computing, 52, Article 100873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100873
Susperreguy, M. I., Lonardo, S., Douglas, H., Xu, C., LeFevre, J. A., Del Río, M. F., & Salinas, V. (2022). Home mathematics environment and math performance of Chilean students in kindergarten and grades 1 to 3. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 59, 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.11.004
Tamimy, M., Rashidi, N., & Ling Koh, J. H. (2023). The use of cooperative learning in English as foreign language classes: The prevalence, fidelity, and challenges. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, Article 103915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103915
Tan, W. K., Sunar, M. S., & Goh, E. S. (2023). Analysis of the college underachievers’ transformation via gamified learning experience. Entertainment Computing, 44, Article 100524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2022.100524
Toda, A. M., Oliveira, W., Klock, A. C., Palomino, P. T., Pimenta, M., Gasparini, I., Shi, L., Bittencourt, I., Isotani, S., & Cristea, A. I. (2019). A taxonomy of game elements for gamification in educational contexts: Proposal and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 19^th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2019.00028
UNESCO. (2023). Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/technology
UNICEF. (2021). At least 200 million school-age children live in countries that remain unprepared to implement distance learning during school closures in future emergencies. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/peru/comunicados-prensa/200-millones-ninos-edad-escolar-viven-paises-sin-estar-preparados-educacion-distancia-cierre-escuelas-emergencias-covid19
UNICEF. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the education of children and adolescents. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/media/15231/file/Issue%20Brief%20-%20The%20Impact%20of%20the%20COVID-19%20Pandemic%20on%20Children’s%20Learning%20in%20Indonesia.pdf
UNICEF. (2024). The digital divide impacts on education. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.es/educa/blog/covid-19-brecha-educativa
Van Vemde, L., Donker, M. H., & Mainhard, T. (2022). Teachers, loosen up! How teachers can trigger interpersonally cooperative behavior in students at risk of academic failure. Learning and Instruction, 82, Article 101687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101687
Videnovik, M., Bogdanova, A. M., & Trajkovik, V. (2024). Game-based learning approach in computer science in primary education: A systematic review. Entertainment Computing, 48, Article 100616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2023.100616
Villalustre-Martínez, L. (2024). Narraciones gamificadas y evaluación de competencias en la formación inicial del profesorado [Gamified narratives and assessment of competencies in initial teacher training]. Revista de Estudios Sobre Lectura, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2024.23.2.431
Vu, K., Dao, V., DeJaeghere, J., & Glewwe, P. (2024). Collaborative learning in the Vietnam Escuela Nueva model and students’ learning behaviors: A mixed methods longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Development, 106, Article 103017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103017
Wang, Y.-H. (2020). Design-based research on integrating learning technology tools into higher education classes to achieve active learning. Computers & Education, 156, Article 103935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103935
Warden, C. A., Chen, J. F., & Stanworth, J. O. (2024). The role of social networks in digital learning gamification: Learner communication preferences and performance effects. Learning & Instruction, 92, Article 101911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101911
Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2019). Designing sociable online learning environments and enhancing social presence: An affordance enrichment approach. Computers & Education, 142, Article 103622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103622
Wirani, Y., Nabarian, T., & Romadhon, M. S. (2022). Evaluation of continued use on Kahoot! as a gamification-based learning platform from the perspective of Indonesia students. Procedia Computer Science, 197, 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.172
Witte, A. M., Runze, J., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2024). Secure base script knowledge and video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting-sensitive discipline. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 92, Article 101651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2024.101651
World Bank. (2022). Learning is in crisis: Prioritizing education and effective policies to recover lost learning. World Bank. https://www.bancomundial.org/es/news/immersive-story/2022/09/16/learning-in-crisis-prioritizing-education-effective-policies-to-recover-lost-learning
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023). Passive, active, and constructive engagement with peer feedback: A revised model of learning from peer feedback. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 73, Article 102160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102160
Xiao, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2023). Personalised gamification enhances student participation but produces mixed effects on emotional and cognitive engagements: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2299977
Yuan, X., & Zheng, Q. (2024). Analysis of interactive impact and student behavior of teaching online courses based on gamified learning. Entertainment Computing, 50, Article 100672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100672
Zhenyu, S. (2025). Gamified learning experience based on digital media and the application of virtual teaching robots in dance teaching. Entertainment Computing, 52, Article 100785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100785
Zhu, J., Yang, Y., & Yan, Z. (2024). Relationships between teacher feedback and English writing proficiency in Chinese students: The mediating effect of writing self-regulated learning strategies. System, 123, Article 103338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103338
Zumbach, J., Rammerstorfer, L., & Deibl, I. (2019). Cognitive and metacognitive support in learning with a serious game about demographic change. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.026

Citation

Holguin-Alvarez, J., Cruz-Montero, J., Ruiz-Salazar, J., Atoche Wong, R. L., & Merino-Flores, I. (2025). Effects of feedback dynamics and mixed gamification on cognitive underachievement in school. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(1), ep551. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15717

Holguin-Alvarez, J., Cruz-Montero, J., Ruiz-Salazar, J., Atoche Wong, R. L., and Merino-Flores, I. (2025). Effects of feedback dynamics and mixed gamification on cognitive underachievement in school. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(1), ep551. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15717

Holguin-Alvarez J, Cruz-Montero J, Ruiz-Salazar J, Atoche Wong RL, Merino-Flores I. Effects of feedback dynamics and mixed gamification on cognitive underachievement in school. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2025;17(1), ep551. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15717

Holguin-Alvarez, Jhon, Juana Cruz-Montero, Jenny Ruiz-Salazar, Raquel Leonor Atoche Wong, and Irene Merino-Flores. "Effects of feedback dynamics and mixed gamification on cognitive underachievement in school". Contemporary Educational Technology 2025 17 no. 1 (2025): ep551. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15717

Holguin-Alvarez, Jhon et al. "Effects of feedback dynamics and mixed gamification on cognitive underachievement in school". Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 17, no. 1, 2025, ep551. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15717

Holguin-Alvarez J, Cruz-Montero J, Ruiz-Salazar J, Atoche Wong RL, Merino-Flores I. Effects of feedback dynamics and mixed gamification on cognitive underachievement in school. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2025;17(1):ep551. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15717